LinkedIn authority builder
Quick answer
- 01What is it?
- Here's what most people get wrong about LinkedIn: they're trying to go viral. It stands out by giving social content a defined shape, so the agent asks for better context and returns a more usable result.
- 02Inputs
- Context for social content: your goals, audience, constraints, and any source material the skill asks for.
- 03Output
- A ready-to-use result for social content: the analysis, copy, or recommendations the agent produces.
Add this skill
Install as a package
Installs this one skill package for your coding agent, including any supporting files that skill ships with — not every skill in the repository. Read the tutorial.
$ npx skills add brianrwagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skills --skill linkedin-authority-builderSkill instructions
The instruction file for this skill. The skill also includes other files you need to install to use it.
LinkedIn Authority Builder
Here's what most people get wrong about LinkedIn: they're trying to go viral.
Viral doesn't pay your bills. Being remembered by the right 500 people when they need what you do — that pays your bills.
This skill builds a content system around consistent positioning and clear pillars — not hacks.
Mode
Detect from context or ask: "Starter plan, full content system, or 90-day build?"
| Mode | What you get | Best for |
|---|---|---|
quick | 3 content pillars + 1-week posting starter plan | Getting unstuck, first week of consistency |
standard | Full content system: pillars, formats, posting rhythm + first week written | Building a repeatable presence |
deep | Full system + 90-day calendar + 10 posts written + engagement playbook | Serious authority-building campaign |
Default: standard — use quick if they just need to start posting. Use deep if they're committing to LinkedIn as a growth channel.
Context Loading Gates
Before generating any strategy, load:
- Current positioning: One-liner, ICP, key differentiator (load from
positioning-basicsoutput if available) - Target audience on LinkedIn: Specific titles, company stages, industries
- Posting history: What have they tried? What worked? What didn't?
- Content goals: Leads / job offers / speaking / partnerships / audience growth
- Available time per week: Hours they can realistically commit
Sequencing gate: If positioning isn't clear yet, stop and ask:
"Before building a content strategy, I need your one-liner: 'I help [specific audience] with [specific outcome] through [unique approach].' Do you have this locked, or should we nail positioning first with
positioning-basics?"
Do not build a content system for an unclear position — the content will be unfocused.
Also suggest:
"Run
linkedin-profile-optimizerif you haven't — the content we build needs a profile that converts the traffic."
Phase 1: Positioning Alignment Analysis
Before recommending any content, reason through:
- Positioning check: Is the one-liner specific enough to anchor content pillars? If it's "I help businesses grow," that's too vague — push for specificity before proceeding.
- Audience clarity: Are we targeting a specific title + company stage, or a demographic? Specific is better.
- Time-to-output match: If they have 2 hours/week, don't recommend 5 posts/week. Sustainability matters more than ambition.
- Goal alignment: Content for lead generation looks different from content for speaking gigs. Confirm goal before building pillars.
Output a brief strategy assessment:
"You're a [role] targeting [audience] with [X hours/week] and a goal of [outcome]. I'll build a [3/5 post/week] strategy anchored to [X] pillars. The main gap in your current approach: [specific gap]."
Phase 2: Content Pillars (3–5 Required)
Each pillar must pass all 4 tests:
- You have genuine expertise (not just interest)
- Your target audience actively cares about it
- You can produce content on it consistently for 6+ months
- It connects to what you sell or want to be known for
Pillar ratio:
- 70% core expertise → builds authority
- 20% adjacent insights → makes you interesting
- 10% personal → makes you relatable
Output format per pillar:
Pillar: [Name]
Ratio: [%]
Content types: [frameworks / stories / case studies]
Example hook: "[First line of a real post]"
Connection to goal: [how this drives the stated outcome]
Phase 3: Format Selection & Post Templates
Format-to-Goal Mapping
| Format | Best For | Engagement Level |
|---|---|---|
| Story | Connection, memorability | High |
| Framework/List | Authority, credibility | High |
| Hot take | Reach, visibility | Variable |
| Case study/proof | Credibility, late-stage trust | Medium |
| Behind-the-scenes | Relatability, trust | Medium |
Recommended weekly mix:
- 2–3 frameworks (authority)
- 1–2 stories (connection)
- 1 proof point (credibility)
Post Templates
Story Post:
[Hook — the moment or realization]
[Setup — quick context]
[Tension — what was hard or went wrong]
[Turn — the insight]
[Lesson — the takeaway]
[Question — drives engagement]
Framework Post:
[Hook — bold claim or problem statement]
[Why this matters — 1-2 sentences]
[The X-step framework:]
1. [Step + brief explanation]
2. [Step + brief explanation]
3. [Step + brief explanation]
[Key insight or summary]
[CTA or discussion question]
Hot Take:
[Controversial statement]
[Your reasoning — 2-3 sentences]
[The nuance people miss]
[What to do instead]
[Question to drive comments]
Phase 4: Content Calendar with Real Dates
Generate a 4-week calendar with actual dates (not generic day names):
| Date | Pillar | Format | Hook (first line) | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [YYYY-MM-DD] | [Pillar] | Framework | "[First line]" | Draft |
| [YYYY-MM-DD] | [Pillar] | Story | "[First line]" | Draft |
Fill 4 full weeks. Generic "Week 1, Monday" output is not sufficient.
Also output 5 starter post hooks ready to write immediately — these break the blank-page problem:
1. [Hook]
2. [Hook]
3. [Hook]
4. [Hook]
5. [Hook]
Phase 5: Self-Critique Pass (REQUIRED)
After generating the strategy, evaluate:
- Is the positioning one-liner specific enough to anchor the pillars?
- Are the 5 starter hooks actually strong — would they stop the scroll?
- Does the time commitment match the user's stated available hours?
- Is at least one pillar directly tied to the revenue/goal outcome?
- Does the calendar have actual dates, or just generic "Day 1/Day 3" placeholders?
- Would this content system still work in 6 months if the user stays consistent?
Flag issues: "Pillar 3 ('general business tips') doesn't connect to your stated goal of attracting SaaS founders. Replace with something more specific."
Phase 6: 30-Day Iteration Protocol
After 30 days, review with these questions:
- Which posts got the most comments? What pillar did they fall under?
- Which posts drove DMs or profile views?
- Which posts got the most impressions regardless of engagement?
Adjust based on data:
- If case study posts outperform frameworks → increase case study ratio
- If stories drive DMs but frameworks drive impressions → use both intentionally
Output Structure
## LinkedIn Strategy: [Name] — [Date]
### Positioning Alignment
[One-liner + assessment of clarity]
### Content Pillars
[3-5 pillars with ratio, examples, connection to goal]
### Weekly Rhythm
- Posts/week: [X]
- Best times: [e.g., Tue/Thu 8am EST]
- Active commenting: [X min/day]
### Format Mix
[Breakdown with rationale]
### 4-Week Content Calendar
[Table with real dates + hooks]
### 5 Starter Posts (Write These First)
[Hooks with format labels]
### Engagement Plan
[Who to engage with, how much time, what to say]
### Self-Critique Notes
[Issues flagged + recommended fixes]
### 30-Day Review Triggers
[What to measure and when to adjust]
### Cross-References
- linkedin-profile-optimizer (run before publishing)
- content-idea-generator (for ongoing idea generation)
- voice-extractor (to ensure posts sound authentic)
Skill by Brian Wagner | AI Marketing Architect | brianrwagner.com
Supporting file: SKILL-OC.md
Platform: OpenClaw (token-optimized)
Required Inputs
- Current positioning one-liner ("I help [audience] with [outcome] through [approach]")
- Target audience on LinkedIn (specific titles, company stages, industries)
- Posting history (what worked, what didn't)
- Content goal (leads / speaking / partnerships / audience growth)
- Available time per week
Positioning gate: If positioning isn't clear → stop: "Run positioning-basics first. Content without clear positioning is unfocused."
Profile gate: "Run linkedin-profile-optimizer — content needs a profile that converts."
Mode
| Mode | Output | Use when |
|---|---|---|
quick | 3 content pillars + 1-week starter plan | Getting unstuck |
standard | Full system: pillars + formats + rhythm + first week written | Default |
deep | Full system + 90-day calendar + 10 posts + engagement playbook | Serious authority campaign |
Phase 1: Strategy Assessment
Output: "You're a [role] targeting [audience] with [X hrs/week] and goal of [outcome]. I'll build a [3/5 post/week] strategy anchored to [X] pillars. Main gap: [specific gap]."
Phase 2: Content Pillars (3–5)
Each pillar must pass 4 tests: you have genuine expertise, audience actively cares, you can sustain it 6+ months, it connects to your goal.
Pillar ratio: 70% core expertise | 20% adjacent | 10% personal
Format per pillar:
Pillar: [Name] | Ratio: % | Types: [frameworks/stories/case studies]
Hook example: "[First line of a real post]"
Goal connection: [How this drives stated outcome]
Phase 3: Format Mix
| Format | Best For | Weekly Count |
|---|---|---|
| Framework/List | Authority | 2–3 |
| Story | Connection | 1–2 |
| Case study | Credibility | 1 |
| Hot take | Reach | Occasional |
Phase 4: Content Calendar (use real dates)
| Date | Pillar | Format | Hook (first line) | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [YYYY-MM-DD] | ... | ... | "..." | Draft |
Fill 4 full weeks. No "Week 1, Monday" placeholders.
5 starter post hooks (break the blank-page problem):
- [Hook] 2. [Hook] 3. [Hook] 4. [Hook] 5. [Hook]
Self-Critique (required)
- Positioning specific enough to anchor pillars?
- 5 starter hooks would actually stop the scroll?
- Time commitment matches user's stated hours?
- At least one pillar directly tied to revenue/goal?
- Calendar has actual dates?
Skill by Brian Wagner | AI Marketing Architect
Common questions
How do I install LinkedIn authority builder in Cursor, Claude Code, or Codex?
Run npx skills add brianrwagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skills --skill linkedin-authority-builder in the project where you want it, then ask your agent for the skill by name. The --skill flag installs only LinkedIn authority builder, not every skill in the repository.
Where does LinkedIn authority builder come from and what license is it under?
LinkedIn authority builder comes from the brianrwagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skills repository on GitHub. That repository has 344 GitHub stars. No license was detected on the source repository, so check with the author before redistributing it.
Prefer plain text? Read the LinkedIn authority builder guide as markdown.
Related skills
More from brianrwagner