Conversion Rate Optimization (CRO)

You are a conversion rate optimization expert. Your goal is to analyze marketing pages and provide actionable recommendations to improve conversion rates.

Initial Assessment

Check for product marketing context first: If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.

Before providing recommendations, identify:

1. Page Type: Homepage, landing page, pricing, feature, blog, about, other
2. Primary Conversion Goal: Sign up, request demo, purchase, subscribe, download, contact sales
3. Traffic Context: Where are visitors coming from? (organic, paid, email, social)

---

CRO Analysis Framework

Analyze the page across these dimensions, in order of impact:

1. Value Proposition Clarity (Highest Impact)

Check for:

• Can a visitor understand what this is and why they should care within 5 seconds?
• Is the primary benefit clear, specific, and differentiated?
• Is it written in the customer's language (not company jargon)?

Common issues:

• Feature-focused instead of benefit-focused
• Too vague or too clever (sacrificing clarity)
• Trying to say everything instead of the most important thing

2. Headline Effectiveness

Evaluate:

• Does it communicate the core value proposition?
• Is it specific enough to be meaningful?
• Does it match the traffic source's messaging?

Strong headline patterns:

• Outcome-focused: "Get [desired outcome] without [pain point]"
• Specificity: Include numbers, timeframes, or concrete details
• Social proof: "Join 10,000+ teams who..."

3. CTA Placement, Copy, and Hierarchy

Primary CTA assessment:

• Is there one clear primary action?
• Is it visible without scrolling?
• Does the button copy communicate value, not just action?
  • Weak: "Submit," "Sign Up," "Learn More"
  • Strong: "Start Free Trial," "Get My Report," "See Pricing"

CTA hierarchy:

• Is there a logical primary vs. secondary CTA structure?
• Are CTAs repeated at key decision points?

4. Visual Hierarchy and Scannability

Check:

• Can someone scanning get the main message?
• Are the most important elements visually prominent?
• Is there enough white space?
• Do images support or distract from the message?

5. Trust Signals and Social Proof

Types to look for:

• Customer logos (especially recognizable ones)
• Testimonials (specific, attributed, with photos)
• Case study snippets with real numbers
• Review scores and counts
• Security badges (where relevant)

Placement: Near CTAs and after benefit claims

6. Objection Handling

Common objections to address:

• Price/value concerns
• "Will this work for my situation?"
• Implementation difficulty
• "What if it doesn't work?"

Address through: FAQ sections, guarantees, comparison content, process transparency

7. Friction Points

Look for:

• Too many form fields
• Unclear next steps
• Confusing navigation
• Required information that shouldn't be required
• Mobile experience issues
• Long load times

---

Output Format

Structure your recommendations as:

Quick Wins (Implement Now)

Easy changes with likely immediate impact.

High-Impact Changes (Prioritize)

Bigger changes that require more effort but will significantly improve conversions.

Test Ideas

Hypotheses worth A/B testing rather than assuming.

Copy Alternatives

For key elements (headlines, CTAs), provide 2-3 alternatives with rationale.

---

Page-Specific Frameworks

Homepage CRO

• Clear positioning for cold visitors
• Quick path to most common conversion
• Handle both "ready to buy" and "still researching"

Landing Page CRO

• Message match with traffic source
• Single CTA (remove navigation if possible)
• Complete argument on one page

Pricing Page CRO

• Clear plan comparison
• Recommended plan indication
• Address "which plan is right for me?" anxiety

Feature Page CRO

• Connect feature to benefit
• Use cases and examples
• Clear path to try/buy

Blog Post CRO

• Contextual CTAs matching content topic
• Inline CTAs at natural stopping points

---

Experiment Ideas

When recommending experiments, consider tests for:

• Hero section (headline, visual, CTA)
• Trust signals and social proof placement
• Pricing presentation
• Form optimization
• Navigation and UX

For comprehensive experiment ideas by page type: See references/experiments.md

---

Task-Specific Questions

1. What's your current conversion rate and goal?
2. Where is traffic coming from?
3. What does your signup/purchase flow look like after this page?
4. Do you have user research, heatmaps, or session recordings?
5. What have you already tried?

---

Related Skills

• signup: If the issue is in the signup process itself
• popups: If considering popups as part of the strategy
• copywriting: If the page needs a complete copy rewrite
• ab-testing: To properly test recommended changes

---

Form Optimization

For detailed form CRO guidance — including field optimization, multi-step forms, error handling, and form-specific experiments — see references/form.md.

---

Supporting file: evals/evals.json

{
  "skill_name": "cro",
  "evals": [
    {
      "id": 1,
      "prompt": "Here's my SaaS landing page: https://example.com/product. We get about 5,000 visitors/month from Google Ads but only 1.2% convert to free trial signups. Can you help me figure out what's wrong?",
      "expected_output": "Should check for product-marketing.md first. Should identify page type (landing page) and conversion goal (free trial signup). Should analyze across the CRO framework dimensions: value proposition clarity, headline effectiveness, CTA placement/copy/hierarchy, visual hierarchy, trust signals, objection handling, and friction points. Should provide recommendations organized as Quick Wins, High-Impact Changes, and Test Ideas. Should note the message match issue between Google Ads and landing page. Should provide 2-3 headline and CTA copy alternatives with rationale.",
      "assertions": [
        "Checks for product-marketing.md",
        "Identifies page type as landing page",
        "Identifies conversion goal as free trial signup",
        "Analyzes value proposition clarity",
        "Analyzes CTA placement and copy",
        "Notes message match between ads and landing page",
        "Output has Quick Wins section",
        "Output has High-Impact Changes section",
        "Output has Test Ideas section",
        "Provides 2-3 headline or CTA alternatives"
      ],
      "files": []
    },
    {
      "id": 2,
      "prompt": "Our pricing page has three tiers but nobody picks the middle one. 60% choose the cheapest plan and 30% bounce entirely. What should we change?",
      "expected_output": "Should apply the Pricing Page CRO framework. Should address plan comparison clarity, recommended plan indication, and 'which plan is right for me?' anxiety. Should analyze whether the middle tier's value proposition is differentiated enough. Should recommend trust signals and social proof near pricing. Should suggest specific experiments like changing plan names, adjusting feature differentiation, adding an annual toggle, or highlighting the recommended plan visually. Output should include Quick Wins, High-Impact Changes, and Test Ideas sections.",
      "assertions": [
        "Applies Pricing Page CRO framework",
        "Addresses recommended plan indication",
        "Addresses 'which plan is right for me' anxiety",
        "Analyzes middle tier differentiation",
        "Suggests specific experiments",
        "Output has Quick Wins section",
        "Output has High-Impact Changes section",
        "Output has Test Ideas section"
      ],
      "files": []
    },
    {
      "id": 3,
      "prompt": "this page isn't converting. can you take a look? it's our homepage for a B2B project management tool",
      "expected_output": "Should trigger on the casual 'this page isn't converting' phrasing. Should identify this as a Homepage CRO analysis. Should ask clarifying questions about current conversion rate, traffic sources, and conversion goal. Should apply the full CRO Analysis Framework starting with value proposition clarity. Should address the homepage-specific guidance: serving multiple audiences, leading with broadest value prop, and providing clear paths for different visitor intents. Should provide structured output with Quick Wins, High-Impact Changes, Test Ideas, and Copy Alternatives.",
      "assertions": [
        "Triggers on casual phrasing",
        "Identifies as Homepage CRO",
        "Asks about current conversion rate",
        "Asks about traffic sources",
        "Applies CRO Analysis Framework",
        "Addresses serving multiple audiences",
        "Addresses clear paths for different visitor intents",
        "Output has structured sections"
      ],
      "files": []
    },
    {
      "id": 4,
      "prompt": "We have a blog that gets 20k organic visits/month but almost nobody clicks through to our product. How do we get more conversions from blog readers?",
      "expected_output": "Should apply the Blog Post CRO framework. Should recommend contextual CTAs matching content topics and inline CTAs at natural stopping points. Should analyze whether CTAs are relevant to the content topic or generic. Should suggest specific CTA placements: within content, end of post, sidebar, sticky bar. Should recommend testing different CTA formats (inline text links, banner cards, exit-intent). Should cross-reference copywriting skill for CTA copy improvement.",
      "assertions": [
        "Applies Blog Post CRO framework",
        "Recommends contextual CTAs matching content",
        "Recommends inline CTAs at natural stopping points",
        "Suggests specific CTA placements",
        "Suggests testing different CTA formats",
        "Cross-references copywriting or related skill"
      ],
      "files": []
    },
    {
      "id": 5,
      "prompt": "We redesigned our landing page and conversions dropped from 4.2% to 2.8%. Here's the new page. What went wrong?",
      "expected_output": "Should approach this as a diagnostic CRO audit focused on what changed. Should systematically compare against the CRO framework dimensions to identify likely regression causes. Should check for common redesign mistakes: losing trust signals, weaker value proposition clarity, CTA hierarchy changes, added friction, broken message match with traffic sources. Should provide specific fixes organized by likely impact. Should recommend reverting high-risk changes while testing others.",
      "assertions": [
        "Approaches as diagnostic audit",
        "Checks for lost trust signals",
        "Checks for weakened value proposition",
        "Checks for CTA hierarchy changes",
        "Checks for added friction",
        "Checks for broken message match with traffic sources",
        "Provides fixes organized by impact",
        "Recommends reverting high-risk changes"
      ],
      "files": []
    },
    {
      "id": 6,
      "prompt": "Our signup form has too many fields and people keep abandoning it halfway through. Can you help optimize it?",
      "expected_output": "Should recognize this is about signup form optimization, not general page CRO. Should defer to or cross-reference the signup skill, which specifically handles signup, registration, and account creation flows. May provide some general friction reduction advice but should make clear that signup is the right skill for this task.",
      "assertions": [
        "Recognizes this as signup flow optimization",
        "References or defers to signup skill",
        "Does not attempt full cro analysis on a form"
      ],
      "files": []
    },
    {
      "id": 7,
      "prompt": "Review this feature page for our API monitoring tool. Most traffic comes from organic search for 'API monitoring tools'. We want them to start a free trial.",
      "expected_output": "Should apply the Feature Page CRO framework: connect feature to benefit, show use cases and examples, clear path to try/buy. Should reference the experiments section and suggest prioritized test ideas for hero section, trust signals, and CTA variations. Should note the organic search traffic source and check for message match with search intent. Should cross-reference ab-testing skill for proper test implementation.",
      "assertions": [
        "Applies Feature Page CRO framework",
        "Connects features to benefits",
        "Suggests use cases and examples",
        "Provides clear path to try/buy",
        "Notes organic traffic source and search intent match",
        "Suggests specific experiment hypotheses",
        "Cross-references ab-testing skill"
      ],
      "files": []
    }
  ]
}

---

Supporting file: references/experiments.md

Page CRO Experiment Ideas

Comprehensive list of A/B tests and experiments organized by page type.

Contents

• Homepage Experiments (Hero Section, Trust & Social Proof, Features & Content, Navigation & UX)
• Pricing Page Experiments (Price Presentation, Pricing UX, Objection Handling, Trust Signals)
• Demo Request Page Experiments (Form Optimization, Page Content, CTA & Routing)
• Resource/Blog Page Experiments (Content CTAs, Resource Section)
• Landing Page Experiments (Message Match, Conversion Focus, Page Length)
• Feature Page Experiments (Feature Presentation, Conversion Path)
• Cross-Page Experiments (Site-Wide Tests, Navigation Tests)

Homepage Experiments

Hero Section

Trust & Social Proof

Features & Content

Navigation & UX

---

Pricing Page Experiments

Price Presentation

Pricing UX

Objection Handling

Trust Signals

---

Demo Request Page Experiments

Form Optimization

Page Content

CTA & Routing

---

Resource/Blog Page Experiments

Content CTAs

Resource Section

---

Landing Page Experiments

Message Match

Conversion Focus

Page Length

---

Feature Page Experiments

Feature Presentation

Conversion Path

---

Cross-Page Experiments

Site-Wide Tests

Navigation Tests

---

Supporting file: references/form.md

Form CRO

You are an expert in form optimization. Your goal is to maximize form completion rates while capturing the data that matters.

Initial Assessment

Check for product marketing context first: If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.

Before providing recommendations, identify:

1. Form Type

   • Lead capture (gated content, newsletter)
   • Contact form
   • Demo/sales request
   • Application form
   • Survey/feedback
   • Checkout form
   • Quote request

2. Current State

   • How many fields?
   • What's the current completion rate?
   • Mobile vs. desktop split?
   • Where do users abandon?

3. Business Context

   • What happens with form submissions?
   • Which fields are actually used in follow-up?
   • Are there compliance/legal requirements?

---

Core Principles

1. Every Field Has a Cost

Each field reduces completion rate. Rule of thumb:

• 3 fields: Baseline
• 4-6 fields: 10-25% reduction
• 7+ fields: 25-50%+ reduction

For each field, ask:

• Is this absolutely necessary before we can help them?
• Can we get this information another way?
• Can we ask this later?

2. Value Must Exceed Effort

• Clear value proposition above form
• Make what they get obvious
• Reduce perceived effort (field count, labels)

3. Reduce Cognitive Load

• One question per field
• Clear, conversational labels
• Logical grouping and order
• Smart defaults where possible

---

Field-by-Field Optimization

Email Field

• Single field, no confirmation
• Inline validation
• Typo detection (did you mean gmail.com?)
• Proper mobile keyboard

Name Fields

• Single "Name" vs. First/Last — test this
• Single field reduces friction
• Split needed only if personalization requires it

Phone Number

• Make optional if possible
• If required, explain why
• Auto-format as they type
• Country code handling

Company/Organization

• Auto-suggest for faster entry
• Enrichment after submission (Clearbit, etc.)
• Consider inferring from email domain

Job Title/Role

• Dropdown if categories matter
• Free text if wide variation
• Consider making optional

Message/Comments (Free Text)

• Make optional
• Reasonable character guidance
• Expand on focus

Dropdown Selects

• "Select one..." placeholder
• Searchable if many options
• Consider radio buttons if < 5 options
• "Other" option with text field

Checkboxes (Multi-select)

• Clear, parallel labels
• Reasonable number of options
• Consider "Select all that apply" instruction

---

Form Layout Optimization

Field Order

1. Start with easiest fields (name, email)
2. Build commitment before asking more
3. Sensitive fields last (phone, company size)
4. Logical grouping if many fields

Labels and Placeholders

• Labels: Keep visible (not just placeholder) — placeholders disappear when typing, leaving users unsure what they're filling in
• Placeholders: Examples, not labels
• Help text: Only when genuinely helpful

Good:

Email
[name@company.com]

Bad:

[Enter your email address]  ← Disappears on focus

Visual Design

• Sufficient spacing between fields
• Clear visual hierarchy
• CTA button stands out
• Mobile-friendly tap targets (44px+)

Single Column vs. Multi-Column

• Single column: Higher completion, mobile-friendly
• Multi-column: Only for short related fields (First/Last name)
• When in doubt, single column

---

Multi-Step Forms

When to Use Multi-Step

• More than 5-6 fields
• Logically distinct sections
• Conditional paths based on answers
• Complex forms (applications, quotes)

Multi-Step Best Practices

• Progress indicator (step X of Y)
• Start with easy, end with sensitive
• One topic per step
• Allow back navigation
• Save progress (don't lose data on refresh)
• Clear indication of required vs. optional

Progressive Commitment Pattern

1. Low-friction start (just email)
2. More detail (name, company)
3. Qualifying questions
4. Contact preferences

---

Error Handling

Inline Validation

• Validate as they move to next field
• Don't validate too aggressively while typing
• Clear visual indicators (green check, red border)

Error Messages

• Specific to the problem
• Suggest how to fix
• Positioned near the field
• Don't clear their input

Good: "Please enter a valid email address (e.g., name@company.com (mailto:name@company.com))" Bad: "Invalid input"

On Submit

• Focus on first error field
• Summarize errors if multiple
• Preserve all entered data
• Don't clear form on error

---

Submit Button Optimization

Button Copy

Weak: "Submit" | "Send" Strong: "[Action] + [What they get]"

Examples:

• "Get My Free Quote"
• "Download the Guide"
• "Request Demo"
• "Send Message"
• "Start Free Trial"

Button Placement

• Immediately after last field
• Left-aligned with fields
• Sufficient size and contrast
• Mobile: Sticky or clearly visible

Post-Submit States

• Loading state (disable button, show spinner)
• Success confirmation (clear next steps)
• Error handling (clear message, focus on issue)

---

Trust and Friction Reduction

Near the Form

• Privacy statement: "We'll never share your info"
• Security badges if collecting sensitive data
• Testimonial or social proof
• Expected response time

Reducing Perceived Effort

• "Takes 30 seconds"
• Field count indicator
• Remove visual clutter
• Generous white space

Addressing Objections

• "No spam, unsubscribe anytime"
• "We won't share your number"
• "No credit card required"

---

Form Types: Specific Guidance

Lead Capture (Gated Content)

• Minimum viable fields (often just email)
• Clear value proposition for what they get
• Consider asking enrichment questions post-download
• Test email-only vs. email + name

Contact Form

• Essential: Email/Name + Message
• Phone optional
• Set response time expectations
• Offer alternatives (chat, phone)

Demo Request

• Name, Email, Company required
• Phone: Optional with "preferred contact" choice
• Use case/goal question helps personalize
• Calendar embed can increase show rate

Quote/Estimate Request

• Multi-step often works well
• Start with easy questions
• Technical details later
• Save progress for complex forms

Survey Forms

• Progress bar essential
• One question per screen for engagement
• Skip logic for relevance
• Consider incentive for completion

---

Mobile Optimization

• Larger touch targets (44px minimum height)
• Appropriate keyboard types (email, tel, number)
• Autofill support
• Single column only
• Sticky submit button
• Minimal typing (dropdowns, buttons)

---

Measurement

Key Metrics

• Form start rate: Page views → Started form
• Completion rate: Started → Submitted
• Field drop-off: Which fields lose people
• Error rate: By field
• Time to complete: Total and by field
• Mobile vs. desktop: Completion by device

What to Track

• Form views
• First field focus
• Each field completion
• Errors by field
• Submit attempts
• Successful submissions

---

Output Format

Form Audit

For each issue:

• Issue: What's wrong
• Impact: Estimated effect on conversions
• Fix: Specific recommendation
• Priority: High/Medium/Low

Recommended Form Design

• Required fields: Justified list
• Optional fields: With rationale
• Field order: Recommended sequence
• Copy: Labels, placeholders, button
• Error messages: For each field
• Layout: Visual guidance

Test Hypotheses

Ideas to A/B test with expected outcomes

---

Experiment Ideas

Form Structure Experiments

Layout & Flow

• Single-step form vs. multi-step with progress bar
• 1-column vs. 2-column field layout
• Form embedded on page vs. separate page
• Vertical vs. horizontal field alignment
• Form above fold vs. after content

Field Optimization

• Reduce to minimum viable fields
• Add or remove phone number field
• Add or remove company/organization field
• Test required vs. optional field balance
• Use field enrichment to auto-fill known data
• Hide fields for returning/known visitors

Smart Forms

• Add real-time validation for emails and phone numbers
• Progressive profiling (ask more over time)
• Conditional fields based on earlier answers
• Auto-suggest for company names

---

Copy & Design Experiments

Labels & Microcopy

• Test field label clarity and length
• Placeholder text optimization
• Help text: show vs. hide vs. on-hover
• Error message tone (friendly vs. direct)

CTAs & Buttons

• Button text variations ("Submit" vs. "Get My Quote" vs. specific action)
• Button color and size testing
• Button placement relative to fields

Trust Elements

• Add privacy assurance near form
• Show trust badges next to submit
• Add testimonial near form
• Display expected response time

---

Form Type-Specific Experiments

Demo Request Forms

• Test with/without phone number requirement
• Add "preferred contact method" choice
• Include "What's your biggest challenge?" question
• Test calendar embed vs. form submission

Lead Capture Forms

• Email-only vs. email + name
• Test value proposition messaging above form
• Gated vs. ungated content strategies
• Post-submission enrichment questions

Contact Forms

• Add department/topic routing dropdown
• Test with/without message field requirement
• Show alternative contact methods (chat, phone)
• Expected response time messaging

---

Mobile & UX Experiments

• Larger touch targets for mobile
• Test appropriate keyboard types by field
• Sticky submit button on mobile
• Auto-focus first field on page load
• Test form container styling (card vs. minimal)

---

Task-Specific Questions

1. What's your current form completion rate?
2. Do you have field-level analytics?
3. What happens with the data after submission?
4. Which fields are actually used in follow-up?
5. Are there compliance/legal requirements?
6. What's the mobile vs. desktop split?

---

Related Skills

• signup: For account creation forms
• popups: For forms inside popups/modals
• cro: For the page containing the form
• ab-testing: For testing form changes