# Influencer agreement review Human Guide

## What This Is For
General guidance only. It gives the agent a clearer input/output frame for influencer agreement review: what context to ask for, what decisions to make, and what usable artifact to return.

Use this as a human-readable version of the Influencer agreement review agent skill. It is meant for marketers, operators, founders, and other non-coders who want the workflow without reading agent-specific implementation instructions.

## When To Use This
- Use this when you need a repeatable process for influencer agreement review.
- Use this when the task needs judgment, examples, constraints, or a clear output format rather than a one-off prompt.
- Use this when you want to hand an AI assistant enough context to produce a usable marketing artifact.

## When Not To Use This
- Do not use this when you only need a quick factual answer.
- Do not use this when the work depends on private data you cannot share with the assistant.
- Do not use this as a replacement for legal, compliance, financial, or medical review.

## What You Need Before Starting
- The goal or business outcome you want.
- The audience, customer segment, or market context.
- Any source material the assistant should respect, such as notes, briefs, examples, URLs, or brand guidance.
- Constraints such as tone, length, channel, deadline, region, or approval requirements.
- A clear definition of what a good final answer should look like.

## Step-By-Step Workflow
1. State the job clearly: "Use the Influencer agreement review guide to help me with..."
2. Add context: audience, goal, offer, channel, source material, and constraints.
3. Ask the assistant to identify missing inputs before producing the final output.
4. Have the assistant follow the skill-specific guidance below.
5. Review the result against the final checklist and ask for revisions where needed.

## Skill-Specific Guidance
- File uploaded → default to ADVISE (ignore "generate")
- Output language = Input language (auto-detect)
- Read `references/checklist.md`
- Run through each item against document
- Output table with Status (✅/❌) and Notes
- Identify client perspective (Brand or Influencer/Creator)
- Read `references/playbook.md`
- Scan document against playbook criteria
- Output structured consultation:
- Never invent clause/section numbers
- File uploaded = ADVISE mode (not GENERATE)
- GENERATE outputs URL only, no commentary

## Decision Points And Nuance
The original skill emphasizes: Routing, GENERATE Mode, CHECK Mode, ADVISE Mode, Risk Levels, References, Hard Rules, Supporting file: references/checklist.md, Output Format, Document Completeness.

Use these questions to steer the work:
- What is the intended audience or buyer?
- What source material must be preserved?
- What should the assistant optimize for: clarity, persuasion, accuracy, speed, creativity, or conversion?
- What examples represent the desired quality bar?
- What should the assistant avoid?

## Common Mistakes
- | 🔴 RED | Material risk | Must fix |
- Never invent clause/section numbers
- [ ] Influencer must identify third-party materials
- 🔴 Flag as issue — modern agreements must address AI
- [ ] Visibility: "unavoidable"
- [ ] Platform branded content tools required
- | **Ferragni-Balocco** | Misleading charity claims | Exact charity language required verbatim |
- > **BK Guidance:** Whitelisting and paid usage should be priced separately from organic content fees. Specific rates depend on niche, engagement, and negotiation — avoid perpetual rights without additional compensation.

## Copy-And-Paste Prompt
```text
Use the Influencer agreement review human guide.

My goal:
[Describe the business outcome]

Audience:
[Describe who this is for]

Context and source material:
[Paste notes, examples, links, or existing copy]

Constraints:
[Tone, length, channel, timeline, must-include items, must-avoid items]

Before producing the final output, ask me for any missing information that would materially improve the result.
```

## Final Checklist
- [ ] The output matches the original goal.
- [ ] The audience and context are reflected in the answer.
- [ ] Important constraints and source material were preserved.
- [ ] The assistant made the relevant decisions explicit.
- [ ] The final artifact is ready to use, review, or hand to the next person.

## Source
This guide was generated from the skala-io/legal-skills skill entry for `influencer-agreement-review`.

## Source Skill Notes
These notes preserve the nuance from the original skill. Use them as supporting reference when the workflow above feels too generic.

# Influencer Agreement Review

> **NOT LEGAL ADVICE.** General guidance only. Consult qualified counsel.

## Routing

| Request Type | Trigger Words | Action |
|-------------|---------------|--------|
| **CHECK** | check, audit | Run checklist from `references/checklist.md` |
| **ADVISE** | review, advise | Full consultation using `references/playbook.md` |
| **GENERATE** | generate, template | Return URL only |

**Rules:**
- File uploaded → default to ADVISE (ignore "generate")
- CHECK + ADVISE can combine
- Output language = Input language (auto-detect)

## GENERATE Mode

Output only:
```
https://www.skala.io/influencer-marketing-agreement
```

## CHECK Mode

1. Read `references/checklist.md`
2. Run through each item against document
3. Output table with Status (✅/❌) and Notes

## ADVISE Mode

1. Identify client perspective (Brand or Influencer/Creator)
2. Read `references/playbook.md`
3. Scan document against playbook criteria
4. Output structured consultation:

**Format:**
```
**Overall: 🔴/🟡/🟢**

**Summary:** 3-5 bullets

**Issues:**
| Priority | Section | Issue | Recommendation |
|----------|---------|-------|----------------|
| 🔴/🟡/🟢 | X.X | Problem | Preferred: ... / Fallback: ... |

**Missing Terms:** list vs baseline

**Questions:** clarifications needed
```

## Risk Levels

| Level | Meaning | Action |
|-------|---------|--------|
| 🔴 RED | Material risk | Must fix |
| 🟡 YELLOW | Outside preference | Negotiate |
| 🟢 GREEN | Acceptable | Note only |

## References

| File | When to Read |
|------|--------------|
| `references/checklist.md` | CHECK mode — item-by-item review |
| `references/playbook.md` | ADVISE mode — negotiation guidance |

## Hard Rules

- Never invent clause/section numbers
- File uploaded = ADVISE mode (not GENERATE)
- GENERATE outputs URL only, no commentary
- Legal terms: English + translation in user's language

---

## Supporting file: references/checklist.md

# Influencer Agreement Checklist